Police dog mauling appeal

mmmm

will await to see what others think before i post my thoughts…but i guess there is more to this than that reported….

uhuh and attacking the ‘jugular’ area  :-\  ??? and police dont set a dog on unless they are under death or serious injury threat ….and how could he have provoked dog in an arrest situation if dog under control…and and and ….too bland a statement for both sides for me …

and interesting as ever press use the word ‘mauling’ ….had it been a dangerous armed criminal or lets say a terriorist and the dog had just done the job and caused injury in the process…then mauling would not have been the wrod used i bet…lets face it…dog is under cue…danger is danger and they highly cued to respond whatever…it all a bit iffy …

It doesn’t appear that the police are refuting the claim that the dog actually did the damage though  ??? 

Over here we call that a “back injury” . Meaning –“I can’t work I’ve hurt my back and there’s not a doctor in the world who can prove I’m lieing”

no offense intended but the British Press is renowned and mocked the world over for outrageous sensationalism—-how did it happen?