Home Archive › Forums › General Category › General Discussion › JWB sachet
- This topic has 38 replies, 10 voices, and was last updated 18 years, 2 months ago by
Kerry_and_Beau.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 4, 2008 at 7:33 pm #108379
GSPmad
Memberwe feed jwb in this house and have been using the odd sachet to mix tabletty powder in – turkey and rice tho, duibh and lamb don’t get along. >:D
July 4, 2008 at 7:37 pm #108380*Lassie*
MemberKnow my maths is bad but that adds up to 38% 😮
What is the other 62% ??? ???July 4, 2008 at 8:01 pm #108381SuzAndTheDiva
Memberlmao lassie was wondering that too.
July 4, 2008 at 8:08 pm #108382Foxisle_crazy
MemberWell next on the list after oil is…beet pulp, the ubiquitous filler! 😉
July 4, 2008 at 8:12 pm #108383kizkiznobite
Memberwhats the moisture content xtine
and anyway – JWB now part of Pedigree, Masterfoods (Mars Inc) and they wont sign up for the
BUAV No Animal Testing StandardJuly 4, 2008 at 9:06 pm #108384xtine
Membermoisture 82% 😉
July 4, 2008 at 9:17 pm #108385SuzAndTheDiva
Memberhoney says yummy – bag of water for tea
yumyumyumyum 😛 Honey
July 4, 2008 at 9:19 pm #108386kizkiznobite
Memberso – 18% is solids of which 26% of that is meat 4% is rice 8% is peas and carrots
now you know why they say how much to feed 😉
and folk will pay 49p of the 59p for water
July 4, 2008 at 9:21 pm #108387xtine
Memberis outrageous isn’t it >:(
I have squits with better contents 😀
July 4, 2008 at 9:27 pm #108388kizkiznobite
Member;D too much info xtine 😀 😀
imagine how much i would have to feed the wee boyo – think i will stop complaining about how much he costing us 😀
July 4, 2008 at 9:28 pm #108389xtine
Membergod you’d need it on tap 😀 the cost would be extortionate 😮
July 4, 2008 at 9:36 pm #108390SuzAndTheDiva
Member[quote author=xtine link=topic=11928.msg228377#msg228377 date=1215206461]
is outrageous isn’t it >:(I have squits with better contents 😀
[/quote]roflol – I still dont think doggies should eat that either >:D 😀
July 4, 2008 at 10:27 pm #108391Anonymous
Guest[quote author=kizkiznobite link=topic=11928.msg228332#msg228332 date=1215202333]
whats the moisture content xtineand anyway – JWB now part of Pedigree, Masterfoods (Mars Inc) and they wont sign up for the
BUAV No Animal Testing Standard[/quote]
they say the only testing on animals they do is a palatability test to see if dogs and cats like the food, and they would never experiment.
July 4, 2008 at 10:35 pm #108392kizkiznobite
Memberyep but they refuse to sign the agreement so what they hiding – the parent company does test
July 4, 2008 at 10:58 pm #108393Anonymous
Guestmaybe they arent allowed to :-\
Mars
James Wellbeloved were bought by Mars in 2002 but since then we have continued to run as an independent company. This was reinforced with the recent change of all Mars owned companies to the Mars name, with the exception of James Wellbeloved and our sister company Royal Canin.We continue to have our own committed and dedicated staff, our own pet-focused research and development, source our own materials and are about to open our own UK factory. Our motto of “Knowledge and Respect” continues to be the way we work, putting your pet and its needs at the heart of all we do.
Company Statement
1.We undertake no testing on animals other than that which is concerned with the palatability of our foods. Much of our palatability testing takes place on pets owned by members of staff at home. Because the tests involve the animals concerned in trying a number of different and tasty foods,they normally enjoy the tests very much! 2.No test interferes in any unnatural way with the physiology of the animal nor produces any distress in that animal.
3.During the palatability tests, we take scientific measurements concerned with the quantities eaten and the speed and eagerness of eating. We also make subsequent analyses of naturally excreted stool and urine to ensure that our foods are as healthy as possible. These are the only scientific measurements that we undertake.We are a company of animal lovers and most of our staff have pets themselves. We view the welfare and happiness of pets as being of the greatest importance. The thought of harming any pet for commercial reasons is therefore abhorrent to us and would be totally contrary to the ethic of the company.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.